"A friend of mine on Facebook actually overlaid the two images, my image with Mount Cheam, and it was the perfect match," she says.īlair says Engels was in the right place at the right time to see the phenomenon, which has a long history. Those groups helped her pin down what she was actually capturing, a view of Mount Cheam in Chilliwack, B.C., more than 200 kilometres away. "A lot of them were blown away just like I was when I saw it, and they said, 'Wow, what an opportunity to take a picture of that phenomenon,'" Engels says. She captured images and shared them through photography Facebook groups and got instant feedback. "I looked through the zoom lens and thought this is so crisp and clear that it really had me stumped, it was so convincing that it was real," she says. The result was that Engels was able to see and photograph something that wasn’t actually there. "Because of the air being different temperatures and therefore different densities, it refracts the light and sort of bends down our light waves," Blair says. "We can describe our light as waves and we had a temperature inversion so the lower air was colder than the higher air, which doesn’t happen that often," she says. She captured images of what turned out to be a phenomenon she believes was a "superior mirage."Īlexandra Blair is the chair of the Mathematics and Sciences Department at North Island College and describes what occurred. "If it had floated by Campbell River someone would have called it in and that was the piece that didn’t quite make sense for it to be an iceberg," she says. But even then, she knew that was highly unlikely. "I did not know exactly what (I was) looking at, all these questions went through my mind right away."Įngels was seeing, and then photographed, what she first thought was an iceberg in the distance off the park. 9 trying to capture sunset images when her eye caught something unusual. Simone Engels was out at Moorecroft Park in Nanoose on Jan.
#ICEBERG PICTURE PROFESSIONAL#
woman who is considering a life of professional photography already has a head start on her plans after photographing a phenomenon rarely caught on camera – or even seen in person. There was also a nice video clip that had a small interview with the photographer on YouTube find this video clip embedded here.A Nanoose, B.C. Apparently, this picture was composed of four pictures (two icebergs, one sky, and one water) by photographer Ralph A. One such instance of this picture actually led to a page with a story about this picture.
Most Google Image search results can span many pages, or at least you need to use the “Page Down” key multiple times. You might actually end up believing that this picture belongs to them, and they are kind enough to allow you to use it! Fortunately, that thought did not satisfy me, and I am so glad that I was not contented with that conclusion, as you will learn later in this post! Now some of these wallpaper sites proclaim that these pictures are copyrighted by them. Some results were actually fairly high-resolution pictures! Most of these high-res variations were freely downloadable from wallpaper sites. Imagine my surprise then, when I found this picture freely available using Google’s Image search options. Of course, there were many similar pictures available on all these sites, but none of them looked half as good as the original! I searched for iceberg pictures on iStock, Fotolia, Bigstock, and many other sites, but could not find this picture anywhere. It stayed long enough that I wanted to use it in my own slide where I was using an iceberg as an analogy to explain a difficult concept to my audience. I first saw this picture used in a presentation slide, and this was one of those slides that stayed in my memory.
#ICEBERG PICTURE LICENSE#
This brings up a question: how can you even know if the picture you are using is copyright free or not? Unless the picture is placed within a Creative Commons license on a reputed site such as Flickr, there is no way you can really trust any site that says that a picture is free to use! This picture is, therefore, a perfect case study. Why are we even discussing this picture? That’s because the subject of picture copyrights is not always clear. They won’t even publish the price on the Corbis site, as you can see in Figure 2, below. So have all these web sites licensed the picture? That doesn’t appear to be true since this picture is sells at a very high price on Corbis. This is a fully copyrighted picture, yet a quick search on Google Images will show that this picture has been used hundreds of times on the web (see Figure 1, below).įigure 1: Search and you get hundreds of the same results Let’s talk about a fascinating picture of an iceberg by photographer Ralph A.
0 kommentar(er)
